ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳

It covered the period 2015-2022.

The evaluation concluded that:

• While a resilience policy is relevant to WFP¡¯s mandate, it no longe fulfils its role in positioning ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳in the resilience landscape and should be updated for greater conceptual clarity. The lack of an accountability framework has impeded systematic uptake across the organization.
• Increasing support across all the programming areas to achieve resilience objectives will help ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳play a more effective and enabling role across the nexus. Guidance is also needed to facilitate integrated programming and to better consider gender and social inclusion aspects.
• ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳has achieved some consistent outcomes in absorptive capacity.  However, evidence of WFP¡¯s contribution to other resilience capacities is yet to be fully demonstrated.
• Monitoring and reporting frameworks do not adequately support the measurement of resilience results, though improvements are underway. 
• ÐÓ°ÉÂÛ̳needs to reconsider its organizational structures, human resources, funding, and partnership strategies, to truly embrace a resilience agenda.
• Lack of long-term and multi-year funding sources constrains progress in resilience. While leveraging humanitarian funding can offer an interim solution, forward planning is required to ensure medium-term programming and funding intentions are aligned.